In-office Laryngeal Procedures: a Modern Perspective for Vocal Fold Interventions

Introduction: The purpose of this article is to discuss in-office laryngeal procedures as an alternative to surgical intervention under general anesthesia. In-office procedures have become more common due to technological advancements. As a result, these approaches are less invasive and more patient-friendly, with increased pain tolerance and reduced procedure time and cost. Methods: We conducted a thematic analysis of published reports regarding the best known and performed in-office laryngeal interventions. Three questions guided our analysis: What laryngological procedures can be performed in the office setting? What are the advantages of in-office laryngology procedures compared to operating room surgical procedures? Why aren't more in-office procedures performed in some Latin American countries? Discussion: Despite being performed more frequently, there is still controversy whether in-office procedures should be performed as often due to the risk of complications. Furthermore, procedures that are done in the office setting are more popular in some countries than in others, even though their benefit has been well demonstrated. This article describes various in-office procedures, including biopsy, vocal fold injections, and laser surgery. We also discuss what factors might contribute to having office-procedures being performed more frequently in some countries than others. Conclusion: Awake interventions offer numerous benefits, including shorter procedure time, reduced costs, and lower patient morbidity. These advantages have significantly transformed the treatment of laryngeal diseases in modern laryngology practice in a global manner.

Introducción: El propósito de este artículo es discutir los procedimientos laríngeos en el consultorio como una alternativa a la intervención quirúrgica bajo anestesia general. Los procedimientos en consultorio se han vuelto más comunes debido a los avances tecnológicos. Como resultado, estos enfoques son menos invasivos y más amigables para el paciente, con mayor tolerancia al dolor y reducción del tiempo y costo del procedimiento. Métodos: Realizamos un análisis temático de los informes publicados sobre las intervenciones laríngeas más conocidas y realizadas. Tres preguntas guiaron nuestro análisis: ¿Qué procedimientos laringológicos se pueden realizar en el consultorio y cuales sin los más frecuentes?, ¿cuáles son las ventajas de los procedimientos laringológicos fuera del quirófano frente a los que se realizan bajo anestesia general?, ¿por qué no se realizan más procedimientos laringológicos en el consultorio en la mayoría de los países en Latinoamérica? Discusión: A pesar de que se realizan con mayor frecuencia, aún existe controversia sobre si los procedimientos en consultorio deben realizarse con tanta frecuencia debido al riesgo de complicaciones. Además, los procedimientos que se realizan en el consultorio son más populares en algunos países que en otros, aunque sus beneficios han sido bien demostrados. Este artículo describe varios procedimientos en el consultorio, incluida la biopsia, las inyecciones de cuerdas vocales y la cirugía con láser. También se discutieron los factores que podrían contribuir a que los procedimientos en el consultorio se realicen con más frecuencia en algunos países que en otros. Conclusión: Las intervenciones con pacientes despiertos ofrecen numerosos beneficios, incluido un tiempo de procedimiento más corto, costos reducidos y una menor morbilidad para el paciente. Estas ventajas han transformado significativamente el tratamiento de las enfermedades laríngeas en la práctica de la laringología moderna a nivel mundial.

Comparative Evaluation of Linscope and King Vision Video Laryngoscopes in Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction Indirect laryngoscopy has become a widely accepted method for learning the techniques of airway management. The incorporation of small, less expensive, and yet more reliable video cameras in laryngoscopes has given the process of laryngoscopy and intubation a big leap. The King Vision video laryngoscope (Medline Industries, USA) has demonstrated promise in several settings while the Linscope video laryngoscope (Centrum, Turkey) is a newly launched device and no literature is available to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of the Linscope video laryngoscope (VL) and King Vision video laryngoscope. Method This is a randomized controlled trial study. Seventy patients, after approval from the institute's ethical clearance, were divided into two groups. In Group A, patients were intubated with Linscope VL and in Group B patients were intubated with King Vision VL as per the protocol. The primary outcome measure was the duration of tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes were measured by the number of attempts, ease of intubation, and glottic view. Results Both Linscope VL and King Vision VL groups were comparable in terms of mean intubation time (20.34 s vs. 19.45 s). The endotracheal intubation with both devices was 100% successful at the first attempt. Both the devices provided a percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score of > 70% and a clear vision of the glottis. The POGO score obtained with King Vision VL was 83.57 ± 11.41% and with Linscope VL was 87.85 ± 10.31%. POGO score was greater with Linscope VL compared to King Vision VL, but the difference was not statistically significant (p-value>0.05). Conclusion King Vision demonstrated shorter intubation time and fewer optimization maneuvers. Both devices achieved a 100% success rate on the first attempt. While both devices are viable first-line options, King Vision's well-established efficacy in the literature suggests its preference over Linscope till extensive evidence is available in the future.

Comparative evaluation of blind supraglottic airway device insertion versus videolaryngoscope-guided technique in adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVES: A videolaryngoscope may decrease the high incidence of aberrant positioning of supraglottic airway devices (SAD) inserted with blind techniques. We aimed to compare Igel insertion characteristics between blind and videolaryngoscope-assisted techniques. METHODS: In this study 70 adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into blind (Group B, n = 35) and videolaryngoscope-guided (Group V, n = 35) Igel insertion. Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), fiber-optic view score, time for device insertion, first attempt success, ease of insertion, ventilation score, maneuvers, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: OLP was significantly higher in group V at 1 and 10 minutes (24.80 ± 1.91 vs 21.71 ± 2.37; p < 0.001 and 32.60 ± 2.32 vs 30.68 ± 2.93; p = 0.006). The mean fiberoptic scoring (3.63 ± 0.49 vs 3.38 ± 0.49; p = 0.043), a fibreoptic score of grade 4 (24 vs 13; p = 0.012) and time-to-device insertion (25.6 ± 3.5 vs 21.7 ± 4.1; p < 0.001) was considerably higher in group V. First-attempt success (p = 0.630), ease of insertion of SAD (p = 0.540) and nasogastric tube (p = 1), ventilation score (p = 1), number of maneuvers required (p = 1), number of attempts (p = 0.592) and postoperative complications (p = 0.800) were comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The videolaryngoscope-guided technique provided superior airway sealing and reduced malposition of Igel without an increase in adverse events compared to the blind technique. However, this was at the cost of increased time of device insertion. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ctri.nic.in identifier is CTRI/2022/10/046269.

Office Rigid Laryngoscopy as a Predictor for Glottic Exposure in Microlaryngoscopy.

Good glottic exposure is a prerequisite for a good microlaryngeal surgery. Often this is difficult to predict preoperatively. This study aims to evaluate the utility of office-based rigid laryngoscopy (70°) as a screening tool to predict laryngeal exposure during micro laryngoscopy. Sixty-nine patients underwent office-based rigid laryngeal examination followed by micro laryngoscopic surgery for benign vocal cord lesions. Office-based laryngoscopy was classified as grade 1 when the entire glottis with anterior commissure (AC) was visualized without undue traction of tongue; grade 2 when AC was visualized only during phonation and with some traction of tongue and grade 3 when there is an inability to visualise the glottis adequately despite moderate traction of tongue and the examination was completed using a flexible scope. These were correlated with laryngeal exposure during micro laryngoscopy. 42 patients were categorized as grade 1 out of which 39 (93%) had a favourable laryngeal exposure (class 1) while only 3 (7%) had a partially favourable exposure (class 2). 18 patients were categorized as grade 2 out of which 12(66%) had a favourable exposure (class 1) as against 6 (33%) who had a partially favourable exposure (class 2). Nine of our patients were categorized as grade 3 out of which all 9 (100%) had an unfavourable exposure (class 3) requiring angled tele laryngoscopy to complete the surgery. A strong correlation between office-based laryngoscopic grading and exposure during operative laryngoscopy was obtained statistically (Cramer's V test, V = 0.746). Office examination with a 70° telescope is a good predictor of glottic exposure during micro laryngoscopy. We believe that the ease of performing a micro laryngoscopy in the operating room is directly proportional to the ease of doing laryngoscopy in the office.

Determinants of difficult laryngoscopy based on upper airway indicators: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The main cause of anesthesia-related deaths is the failure to manage difficult airways. Difficult laryngoscopic exposure is a major cause of unsuccessful management of difficult airways. Inadequate preoperative airway assessment hinders the clinical management of difficult airways cases, emphasizing the critical need for accurate identification of difficult airways. Currently, no definitive and reliable indicators are available to predict a difficult airway. Our study aims to predict laryngoscope exposure risk factors by combining ultrasonically measured upper airway anatomic parameters with physical examination indicators. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 75 years, classified as American Standards Association (ASA) I-III, and scheduled for elective general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were included. All patients received the upper airway and ultrasonographic measurements. After anesthesia induction, laryngoscope exposure was analyzed using the Cormack-Lehane grading system, with Grades III and IV as indicative of difficult laryngoscopy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify reliable indicators for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to assess the predictive performance of each indicator. RESULTS: A total of 1120 patients finished the study, with 710 cases found in Grade I laryngoscopic exposure group, 360 cases in Grade II group, and 50 cases in Grade III group. There was no case observed in Grade IV group, thereby resulting in an incidence of difficult laryngoscopy of 4.46%. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that several parameters including age, Body Mass Index (BMI), neck circumference, neck mobility, snoring intensity, as well as ultrasound measurements of the pre-epiglottic space and thyromental distance were identified as significant risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy (P < 0.05). Among these, BMI, and neck circumference exhibited notable predictive value, with Area Under The Curve (AUC) values of 0.746 (95%CI 0.649-0.842) and 0.732 (95%CI 0.638-0.827), respectively. Neck mobility was also identified as an independent risk factor for predicting difficult laryngoscopy (P = 0.009) in multivariate logistic regression analysis, with an AUC of 0.672 (0.562-0.782) in the ROC curve. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed a direct correlation between difficult laryngoscopy and age, BMI, neck circumference, neck mobility, snoring intensity, as well as ultrasound measurements of the pre-epiglottic space and thyromental distance. Furthermore, neck mobility was identified as an independent predictive factor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at clinicaltrials.gov (register no. ChiCTR2100053826, Date of registration: November 30, 2021).

Predictors for Difficult Laryngeal Exposure in Suspension Laryngoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives/Hypothesis: Many researchers have investigated parameters that could independently predict difficult laryngeal exposure (DLE) in suspension laryngoscopy; however, inconsistent results and conclusions have been reported in previous studies. We conducted a meta-analysis of the existing literature to determine the parameters that are significant for a standardized preoperative DLE prediction system. Methods: The literature was retrieved systematically from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), and Wangfang until October 2022. In eligible studies, data were extracted and analyzed using the R language, and effective measures were odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous variables and mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs for continuous variables. Results: The search yielded 1574 studies, of which eighteen involving 2263 patients were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that patients with DLE during microsurgery are often men (OR =1.73, 95% CI = [1.16, 2.57]); older age (MD = 5.47 years, 95% CI = [2.44, 8.51]); high body mass index (BMI; MD = 1.19Kg/m2, 95% CI = [0.33, 2.05]); bullnecked (MD =2.50cm, 95% CI = [1.56, 3.44]); limited mouth opening (MD = -0.52cm, 95% CI = [-0.88, -0.15]); limited neck flexibility (MD = -10.05cm, 95% CI = [-14.10,-6.00]); specific anatomical characteristics; and modified Mallampati's index or test (OR = 3.37, 95% CI = [2.07, 5.48]). Conclusion: Our study made a comprehensive and systematic analysis of The DLE relevant factors. Gender, age, body mass index(BMI), neck circumference (NC), modified Mallampati's index(MMI), inter-incisor gap(IIG), hyoid-mental distance (HMD), thyroid-mental distance (TMD), sterno-mental distance (SMD), and flexion-extension angle were eventually identified as highly correlated factors for DLE.

Low cost smart phone based laryngoscopy for the assessment of vocal cords in patients undergoing thyroid surgery: A pilot study.

Can a smart phone application be reliably used for laryngoscopy? This thesis was tested for peri-operative evaluation of vocal cords in patients undergoing thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Dynamic versus standard bougies for tracheal intubation with direct or indirect laryngoscopy in simulated or real scenarios: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of dynamic versus standard bougies to achieve tracheal intubation. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar on 10 October 2023. We included clinical trials comparing both devices. The primary outcome was the first-attempt intubation success rate. The secondary outcome was the time required for tracheal intubation. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included. Dynamic bougies do not increase first-attempt success rate (RR 1.11; p = 0.06) or shorten tracheal intubation time (MD -0.30 sec; p = 0.84) in clinical trials in humans. In difficult airways, first-attempt success intubation rate was greater for dynamic bougies (RR 1.17; p = 0.002); Additionally, they reduced the time required for intubation (MD -4.80 sec; p = 0.001). First-attempt intubation success rate was higher (RR 1.15; p = 0.01) and time to achieve intubation was shorter when using Macintosh blades combined with dynamic bougies (MD -5.38 sec; p < 0.00001). Heterogeneity was high. CONCLUSION: Dynamic bougies do not increase the overall first-pass success rate or shorten tracheal intubation time. However, dynamic bougies seem to improve first-attempt tracheal intubation rate in patients with difficult airways and in those intubated with a Macintosh blade. Further research is needed for definitive conclusions. REGISTRATION OF PROSPERO: CRD42023472122.

Bispectral index-guided comparison of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant with propofol to achieve an adequate depth for endotracheal intubation - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.

Background and Aims: Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation require an adequate depth of anaesthesia. The study's primary objective was to compare the time needed to achieve the bispectral index (BIS)-guided adequate depth of anaesthesia for endotracheal intubation using fentanyl and dexmedetomidine. Methods: After institutional ethics committee clearance and written informed consent, this randomised study was conducted on 140 patients of either gender between 18 and 60 years who were scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomised to intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (Group D) or fentanyl 2 µg/kg (Group F). The drugs were given as an intravenous infusion over 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the time required to achieve BIS 50. Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's t-test, and non-normally distributed variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Qualitative data were analysed using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The time to achieve BIS 50 was lesser in Group F, 1546 (27) as compared to Group D, 1558 (11) s [mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI) 12[5.11, 18.89]), P < 0.001]. Haemodynamic parameters were comparable at all time points between both the groups, except heart rate, which was significantly lower. Propofol consumption was significantly less in group D than in group F [125.9 (25.36) versus 157.3 (42.80) mg, respectively, mean difference (95% CI) 31.4 (-44.16 to -20.63) P < 0.001)]. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine achieves BIS 50 faster and has a propofol-sparing effect as compared to fentanyl.

A comparative study to evaluate the cervical spine movements during laryngoscopy using Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.

Background and Aim: Intubation with Macintosh requires flexing the lower cervical spine and extending the atlanto-occipital joint to create a "line of sight." Primary aim of study was to compare the extent of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq. Material and Methods: A total of 25 patients of either sex between the age group of 18 and 60 years, having American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of Grade-I and Grade-II, scheduled for elective surgery under image control requiring general anesthesia and intubation were enrolled. A baseline image of the lateral cervical spine including the first four cervical vertebrae was taken by an image intensifier. After administration of general anesthesia, laryngoscopy was first performed using a Macintosh laryngoscope and a second X-ray image of the lateral cervical spine was taken. The second laryngoscopy using a Airtraq laryngoscope was done and the third image of the lateral cervical spine was taken. Angles between occiput and C1; C1 and C2; C2 and C3; C3 and C4; and occiput and C4 were calculated. Atlanto-occipital distance (AOD) was calculated as the distance between occiput and C1. Results: Macintosh showed greater cervical movement as compared with Airtraq but a significant difference in the movement was observed at C2-C3 and C0-C4. Baseline mean AOD was 2.21 ± 1.25 mm, after Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopy was found to be 1.13 ± 0.60 and 1.6 ± 0.78 mm, respectively, and was found to be significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We conclude that Airtraq allows intubation with less movement of the upper cervical spine makes Airtraq preferred equipment for intubation in patients with a potential cervical spine injury.

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in achieving successful emergency endotracheal intubations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Intubating a patient in an emergent setting presents significant challenges compared to planned intubation in an operating room. This study aims to compare video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in achieving successful endotracheal intubation on the first attempt in emergency intubations, irrespective of the clinical setting. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until 27 February 2023. We included only randomized controlled trials that included patients who had undergone emergent endotracheal intubation for any indication, regardless of the clinical setting. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool 2 (ROB2) to assess the included studies. We used the mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR), with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), to pool the continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included with a total of 2470 patients. The overall analysis favored video laryngoscopy over direct laryngoscopy in first-attempt success rate (RR = 1.09, 95% CI [1.02, 1.18], P = 0.02), first-attempt intubation time (MD = - 6.92, 95% CI [- 12.86, - 0.99], P = 0.02), intubation difficulty score (MD = - 0.62, 95% CI [- 0.86, - 0.37], P < 0.001), peri-intubation percentage of glottis opening (MD = 24.91, 95% CI [11.18, 38.64], P < 0.001), upper airway injuries (RR = 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.56], P = 0.005), and esophageal intubation (RR = 0.37, 95% CI [0.15, 0.94], P = 0.04). However, no difference between the two groups was found regarding the overall intubation success rate (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In emergency intubations, video laryngoscopy is preferred to direct laryngoscopy in achieving successful intubation on the first attempt and was associated with a lower incidence of complications.

Bedside preoperative predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure in microlaryngeal surgery.

PURPOSE: Successful microlaryngeal surgery relies on an adequate laryngeal exposure. Recognizing the likelihood of challenging exposure prior to microlaryngeal surgery may assist in selecting the appropriate surgical approach and even prompt consideration of alternative treatment options. We aim to apply the mini-Laryngoscore, a preoperative assessment tool, to our study population and incorporate novel variables to optimize the prediction model. METHODS: This single-center prospective cohort study included 80 consecutive patients undergoing elective microlaryngeal surgery, from January 1, to June 30, 2023. Each patient underwent a presurgical evaluation of 15 parameters and an intraoperative scoring of the anterior commissure visualization. These parameters were assessed for their association with difficult laryngeal exposure, using multiple logistic regression analysis. We created a novel prediction model for DLE and compared it with the existing model, the mini-Laryngoscore. RESULTS: Out of 80 patients, 24 (30%) patients had difficult laryngeal exposure, including 3 cases (3.8%) in which visualization of the anterior commissure was not possible. A large neck diameter (OR, 1.4; CI 1.1-1.9) and the presence of upper teeth (OR, 8.9; CI 1.3-62.8) were independent risk factors for a difficult laryngeal exposure, while a larger interincisors gap was the only independent protector factor (OR, 0.3; CI 0.1-0.8). The logistic regression model combining these three independent risk factors displayed a high discriminative value AUC = 0.89 (CI 0.81-0.97). The predictive performance of the mini-Laryngoscore was 0.73 (CI 0.62-0.85). CONCLUSION: Combining two parameters from the mini-Laryngoscore (upper jaw dental state and interincisors gap distance) with neck circumference measurement can accurately predict the risk of difficult laryngeal exposure.

Applying Lyon consensus criteria in the work-up of patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms - A multicentre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) based on otolaryngologist's assessment of laryngoscopic findings remains contentious in terms of sensitivity and specificity. AIMS: To evaluate GERD prevalence, applying Lyon 2.0 Consensus criteria, in patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms undergoing laryngoscopic examination and impedance-pH monitoring. METHODS: In this retrospective assessment, we included 470 patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms, either isolated or combined with typical symptoms, who had been referred to six tertiary Italian Gastroenterology Units between January and December 2020. Of these, 274 underwent 24-h impedance-pH monitoring and laryngoscopy off PPI therapy. GERD diagnosis followed Lyon Consensus 2.0 criteria, incorporating mean nocturnal baseline impedance when pH-impedance monitoring was inconclusive. RESULTS: Laryngoscopic examination revealed pathological findings (predominantly posterior laryngitis) in 71.2% (195/274). GERD was diagnosed in 29.2% (80/274) via impedance-pH monitoring. The prevalence of GERD in patients with positive or negative laryngoscopy was similar (32.3% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.075). No significant difference in proximal reflux occurrences was noted between positive and negative laryngoscopy groups (33.3% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.133). Laryngoscopy demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 78.8% and 32.0%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 32.3% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 28.4%. In contrast, a threshold of four concurrent laryngoscopic signs, identified in only eight patients, demonstrated a PPV of 93.8% and a NPV of 73.6% (sensitivity 25.4%, specificity 99.2%). CONCLUSION: This study underscores the limited diagnostic accuracy of laryngoscopy, emphasising the necessity of impedance-pH monitoring for confirming GERD diagnoses using Lyon 2.0 criteria in patients with suspected extra-oesophageal symptoms.

Sex Disparities in Applied Force on Maxillary Incisors Among Novices During Laryngoscopy Using a High-Fidelity Simulator: A Prospective Observational Study.

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a common and crucial intervention. Whether the performance of ETI differs according to the sex of the laryngoscopist remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess sex disparities in markers of ETI performance among novices using a high-fidelity simulator. This prospective observational study was conducted from April 2017 to March 2019 in a public medical university. In total, 209 medical students (4th and 5th grade) without clinical ETI experience were recruited. Of the 209 students, 64 (30.6%) were female. The participants used either a Macintosh direct laryngoscope or C-MAC video laryngoscope in combination with a stylet or gum-elastic bougie to perform ETI on a high-fidelity simulator. The primary endpoint was the maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy. The secondary endpoint was the time to ETI. The implanted sensors in the simulator automatically quantified the force and time to ETI. The maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors was approximately 30% lower in the male than female group for all laryngoscopes and intubation aids examined (all P < 0.001). Similarly, the time to ETI was approximately 10% faster in the male than female group regardless of the types of laryngoscopes and intubation aids used (all P < 0.05). In this study, male sex was associated with a lower maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy performed by novices. A clinical study focusing on sex differences in ETI performance is needed to validate our findings.

A prospective, pragmatic non-inferiority study of emergency intubation success with the single-use i-view versus standard reusable video laryngoscope.

INTRODUCTION: Video laryngoscope (VL) technology improves first-pass success. The novel i-view VL device is inexpensive and disposable. We sought to determine the first-pass intubation success with the i-view VL device versus the standard reusable VL systems in routine use at each site. METHODS: We performed a prospective, pragmatic study at two major emergency departments (EDs) when VL was used. We rotated i-view versus reusable VL as the preferred device of the month based on an a priori schedule. An investigator-initiated interim analysis was performed. Our primary outcome was a first-pass success with a non-inferiority margin of 10% based on the per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: There were 93 intubations using the reusable VL devices and 81 intubations using the i-view. Our study was stopped early due to futility in reaching our predetermined non-inferiority margin. Operator and patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The first-pass success rate for the i-view group was 69.1% compared to 84.3% for the reusable VL group. A non-inferiority analysis indicated that the difference (-15.1%) and corresponding 90% confidence limits (-25.3% to -5.0%) did not fall within the predetermined 10% non-inferiority margin. CONCLUSIONS: The i-view device failed to meet our predetermined non-inferiority margin when compared to the reusable VL systems with the study stopping early due to futility. Significant crossover occurred at the discretion of the intubating operator during the i-view month.

Nebulized Versus Intravenously Administered Dexmedetomidine for Obtunding Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparative Study.

Introduction Intravenous dexmedetomidine is known to cause major adverse effects such as bradycardia, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, and heart block when used as premedication for attenuation of the laryngoscopy and intubation response, limiting its routine use. Thus, it is important to study other routes of administration of dexmedetomidine. Objectives To compare the hemodynamic response and sedation score between intravenous and nebulized dexmedetomidine as premedication for the attenuation of the laryngoscopy and intubation response. Materials and methods In this study, 60 patients fulfilling inclusion criteria undergoing surgeries under general anesthesia (ASA Grade I and II) were randomly allocated into two groups of 30 patients each. Group IV received intravenous 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine in 100 mL normal saline, and Group IN received nebulization with 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine diluted to a total volume of 5 cc of normal saline, 30 minutes prior to the induction of general anesthesia. Sedation scores were calculated using the Ramsay sedation score at 20 minutes after the administration of the drug; patients were induced by the standard protocol, and laryngoscopy was performed. Vitals were recorded before the administration of the drug and after intubation at stipulated time intervals. Results The median heart rate becomes significantly lower at 15 minutes (70 vs. 76.5) and 20 minutes (66 vs. 76) after induction among Group IV as compared to Group IN. The median systolic blood pressure was significantly lower at 20 minutes in Group IV (110 mmHg) than in Group IN (119 mmHg). The median diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower at 10 minutes (76 vs. 79), 15 minutes (70 vs. 77), and 20 minutes (69 vs. 78.5) in Group IV than in Group IN. The median of mean arterial pressure was significantly lower at 15 minutes (84.8 vs. 91.5) and 20 minutes (83 vs. 92) in Group IV than in Group IN. A comparison of vitals after induction shows that the median heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower statistically among Group IV as compared to Group IN at 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes after induction (except for systolic blood pressure at 3 minutes). The median sedation score was lower in Group IN (0) than in Group IV (1); this difference is statistically significant. Conclusion The obtundation of hemodynamic responses following laryngoscopy and maintaining hemodynamics intraoperatively is statistically better with nebulized dexmedetomidine compared to intravenous dexmedetomidine.

Comparative Evaluation of Direct Laryngoscopy Versus GlideScope for the Purpose of Laryngoscopy Management and Intubation in Candidates of Cesarean Delivery with General Anesthesia.

Background: The present study aimed at comparing the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and initiation of intubation with either direct or video-assisted laryngoscopy. Materials and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial was performed on 90 pregnant women candidates for cesarean section under general anesthesia. The participants were divided into two groups. In the first group, intubation was performed using direct Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL group). The second group underwent intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope (GSL group). Then, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), the percentage of the saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2), the time-to-intubation (TTI), and the number of intubation attempts were recorded. Results: SBP, DBP, and MAP in the MCL group were significantly higher than GSL group 1, 3, and 5 min after laryngoscopy (P < 0.05). HR in the MCL group with the mean of 118.44 ± 15.53 bpm was significantly higher than that the GSL group with the mean of 110.11 ± 16.68 bpm only 3 min after laryngoscopy (P = 0.016). The TTI in the MCL group was significantly longer than that of the GSL group (12.80 ± 1.86 vs. 10.15 ± 2.61; P = 0.001). The frequency of the first intubation attempt in the GSL group with 91.1% was significantly higher than that the MCL group with 84.4% (P = 0.003). Conclusion: It seems that the GSL technique is a better choice to conduct laryngoscopy with more success in intubation and a higher stability of the patients' hemodynamic status.

Atracurium-Induced Bronchospasm With Flat Capnograph at Induction of General Anaesthesia: A Case Report.

Benzylisoquinolinium neuromuscular blocking agents can precipitate bronchospasm either through allergy/anaphylaxis or isolated stimulation of mast cell histamine release. This report presents a 75-year-old female who attended the day surgery unit for a rigid cystoscopy under general anaesthesia. She had a hyper-reactive airway history of mild historic asthma and sensitivity to aerosols. After administration of atracurium at induction of anaesthesia, ventilation became challenging with no chest rise and a flat CO2 trace. Repeat video laryngoscopy confirmed correct endotracheal tube position. The patient remained cardiovascularly stable with no mucocutaneous signs of anaphylaxis. Administration of high flow oxygen, sevoflurane, salbutamol and magnesium sulfate led to gradual improvement and normalisation of respiratory parameters. Surgery was postponed. This report highlights atracurium as an important trigger of bronchospasm at induction of anaesthesia, and illustrates that in rare cases a flat capnograph does not always indicate a mispositioned airway device. Several aspects of the anaesthetic plan for this patient were suboptimal given her respiratory history, namely, the choice of mode of anaesthesia and choice of neuromuscular blocking agent. These factors are discussed in the context of anaesthetic planning for patients presenting with features suggesting high bronchospastic risk.